Lie Groups on Geometry and some category theory

Universal enveloping algebra

Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:01:36 +0000

In the theory of Lie algebras, we have the notion of representation of a Lie algebra \(\mathfrak{g}\), which consists of a vector space \(V\), and a morphism of Lie algebras \(\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \mathfrak{gl}(V)\).

We are so used to thinking of \(\mathfrak{gl}(V)\) as a Lie algebra, that, we might not remember that the underlying set \(End(V)\) has a structure of an associative algebra, and that we made the underlying set into a Lie algebra by considering the binary operation \([f,g]=fg-gf\) for \(f,g\in End(V)\). This is where the notion of enveloping algebra comes into picture.

Transition maps for principal bundle are smooth

Sat, 26 Jan 2019 08:16:48 +0000

Let \(\pi:P\rightarrow M\) be a principal \(G\) bundle. We choose an open covering \(\{U_\alpha\}\) of \(M\) and trivializations \(\psi_\alpha:\pi^{-1}(U_\alpha)\rightarrow U_\alpha\times G\) defined as \(\psi_\alpha(u)= (\pi(u),\varphi_\alpha(u))\) such that \(\varphi_\alpha(ua)=\varphi_\alpha(u)a\) for all \(u\in \pi^{-1}(U_\alpha)\) and \(a\in G\). Let \(x\in U_\alpha\cap U_\beta\). Given \(v\in \pi^{-1}(x)\subseteq \pi^{-1}(U_\alpha)\cap \pi^{-1}(U_\beta)\), we have \(\varphi_\alpha(v)\in G\) and \(\varphi_\beta(v)\in G\). For \(v'\in \pi^{-1}(x)\) there exists \(g\in G\) such that \(v'=vg\). Then, we have

\(\varphi_\alpha(v')\varphi_\beta(v')^{-1}= \varphi_\alpha(vg)\varphi_\beta(ua)^{-1} =\varphi_\alpha(u)aa^{-1}\varphi_\beta(u)^{-1} =\varphi_\alpha(u)\varphi_\beta(u)^{-1}\)

Thus, for any \(v,v'\in \pi^{-1}(x)\), we have

\(\varphi_\alpha(v)\varphi_\beta(v)^{-1}=\varphi_\alpha(v')\varphi_\beta(v')^{-1}.\)

Equivariant maps are Isomorphisms

Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:49:33 +0000

Let \(G\) be a Lie group and \(\pi_P:P\rightarrow M, \pi_Q:Q\rightarrow M\) be principal \(G\) bundles. Then, any \(G\)-equivariant map \(f:P\rightarrow Q\) inducing identity on \(M\) is a diffeomorphism. The same holds when we have Lie groupoids instead of Lie groups. Let \(\mathcal{G}\) be a Lie groupoid and \(P\rightarrow M, Q\rightarrow M\) be principal \(\mathcal{G}\) bundles. Then, any \(\mathcal{G}\)-equivariant map \(f:P\rightarrow Q\) inducing identity on \(M\) is a diffeomorphism. Above result is very basic thing when defining a stack associated for a Lie groupoid \(\mathcal{G}\). Given a Lie groupoid \(\mathcal{G}\), we define a category fibered in groupoids \(B\mathcal{G}\rightarrow \text{Man}\) by associating for each manifold \(U\) a category \(B\mathcal{G}(U)\) whose objects are principal \(\mathcal{G}\) bundles whose base space is \(U\) i.e., of the form \(P\rightarrow U\) and morphism from an object \(P\rightarrow U\) to another object \(Q\rightarrow U\) is a \(\mathcal{G}\)-equivariant map \(P\rightarrow Q\) that induces \(Id:U\rightarrow U\) on base space of those principal bundles. Thus, to say \(B\mathcal{G}(U)\) is a Lie groupoid, we need to prove that every arrow \((P\rightarrow U)\rightarrow (Q\rightarrow U)\) is an isomorphism which is what we are trying to prove. Let us see the proof for the case of Lie groups. See the set up as following diagram. Let \(p,p'\in P\) are such that \(f(p)=f(p')\), thus, \(\pi_Q(f(p))=\pi_Q(f(p'))\). As \(\pi_Q\circ f=\pi_P\), we have \(\pi_P(p)=\pi_P(p')\) i.e., there exists \(g\in G\) such that \(p'=p.g\). Thus, \(f(p')=f(pg)\). As \(f\) is \(G\)-equivariant, we have \(f(pg)=f(p)g\). Thus, we have \(f(p')=f(p)g\). As the action of \(G\) on \(Q\) is free, \(f(p')=f(p),f(p')=f(p)g\) implies \(g=1\). Thus, \(p'=p\). So, \(f\) is one to one mapping. Let \(q\in Q\). We have \(\pi_Q(q)\in M\). As \(\pi_P\) is surjective, there exists \(p\in P\) such that \(\pi_P(p)=\pi_Q(q)\). As \(\pi_Q\circ f=\pi_P\), we have \(\pi_Q(f(p))=\pi_P(p)=\pi_Q(q)\). As \(\pi_Q(f(p))=\pi_Q(q)\), there exists \(g\in G\) such that \(f(p)g=q\). As \(f\) is \(G\)-equivariant, we have \(f(p)g=f(pg)\). Thus, we have \(q=f(pg)\) which implies that \(f\) is an onto mapping. Suppose that \(\pi_P:P\rightarrow M\) is trivial \(G\) bundle, not for simplicity but because every principal \(G\) bundle is locally trivial and diffeomorphism is something that needs to be checked locally. As \(\pi_P:P\rightarrow M\) is trivial, it has a global section for \(\pi_P\) i.e., a smooth map \(\sigma:M\rightarrow P\) such that \(\pi_P\circ \sigma=1\). This gives a trivialization \(M\times G\xrightarrow{\Phi} P\) i.e., an isomorphism. Consider the cimposition \(f\circ \pi:M\rightarrow Q\). This is again a smooth map such that

\(\pi_Q\circ (f\circ \sigma)=(\pi_Q\circ f)\circ \sigma=\pi_P\circ \sigma=1\)